<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should companies charge the clients on the basis of number of bugs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/charge-client-on-basis-of-number-of-bugs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/charge-client-on-basis-of-number-of-bugs/</link>
	<description>Software Testing Complete Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:06:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sharath</title>
		<link>http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/charge-client-on-basis-of-number-of-bugs/comment-page-1/#comment-81921</link>
		<dc:creator>sharath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 09:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/charge-client-on-basis-of-number-of-bugs/#comment-81921</guid>
		<description>This content is very help ful. thank u for sharing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This content is very help ful. thank u for sharing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sharath</title>
		<link>http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/charge-client-on-basis-of-number-of-bugs/comment-page-1/#comment-81920</link>
		<dc:creator>sharath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 09:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/charge-client-on-basis-of-number-of-bugs/#comment-81920</guid>
		<description>This content is very help . thank u for sharing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This content is very help . thank u for sharing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chakravarthi BS</title>
		<link>http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/charge-client-on-basis-of-number-of-bugs/comment-page-1/#comment-81093</link>
		<dc:creator>Chakravarthi BS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/charge-client-on-basis-of-number-of-bugs/#comment-81093</guid>
		<description>This Idea will work out when both the client and tester work with honesty. If one loose their honesty all the process will go wrong. The clear measures are need to be declare before starting the test process in case of severity of bug etc. or else tester may need to be loose his valuable efforts spent on testing.

Thanks &amp; Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Idea will work out when both the client and tester work with honesty. If one loose their honesty all the process will go wrong. The clear measures are need to be declare before starting the test process in case of severity of bug etc. or else tester may need to be loose his valuable efforts spent on testing.</p>
<p>Thanks &amp; Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: best-quality-testing</title>
		<link>http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/charge-client-on-basis-of-number-of-bugs/comment-page-1/#comment-80975</link>
		<dc:creator>best-quality-testing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 06:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/charge-client-on-basis-of-number-of-bugs/#comment-80975</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much for proividng nice information</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for proividng nice information</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prithvi</title>
		<link>http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/charge-client-on-basis-of-number-of-bugs/comment-page-1/#comment-79946</link>
		<dc:creator>Prithvi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 23:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/charge-client-on-basis-of-number-of-bugs/#comment-79946</guid>
		<description>I think this approach has 2 ways of looking at it.
1st being the client - if this is the kind of approach the client is going to follow then they might make sure to develop  a very robust application in the 1st stage of development which will be very effective and be low cost for the client and can come out with a very good quality of application.
2nd -looking at a resourcing perspective - bussiness perspective especially - it may not work out well as there are many grey areas for example a cosmetic bug lets say a spelling mistake is a very minor one but it will remain as a bug. 
I think final conclusion , it will not work out well in terms of bussiness perspective. however, has advantages in terms of looking at it from client&#039;s perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this approach has 2 ways of looking at it.<br />
1st being the client &#8211; if this is the kind of approach the client is going to follow then they might make sure to develop  a very robust application in the 1st stage of development which will be very effective and be low cost for the client and can come out with a very good quality of application.<br />
2nd -looking at a resourcing perspective &#8211; bussiness perspective especially &#8211; it may not work out well as there are many grey areas for example a cosmetic bug lets say a spelling mistake is a very minor one but it will remain as a bug.<br />
I think final conclusion , it will not work out well in terms of bussiness perspective. however, has advantages in terms of looking at it from client&#8217;s perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/charge-client-on-basis-of-number-of-bugs/comment-page-1/#comment-68252</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 18:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/charge-client-on-basis-of-number-of-bugs/#comment-68252</guid>
		<description>So, with all these people in India taking our jobs who can barely speak or write English maybe we should have a Pay-Per-Edit feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, with all these people in India taking our jobs who can barely speak or write English maybe we should have a Pay-Per-Edit feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prasanna</title>
		<link>http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/charge-client-on-basis-of-number-of-bugs/comment-page-1/#comment-67434</link>
		<dc:creator>prasanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/charge-client-on-basis-of-number-of-bugs/#comment-67434</guid>
		<description>its a good idea if testers r good. otherwise good for client</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its a good idea if testers r good. otherwise good for client</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mahantesh</title>
		<link>http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/charge-client-on-basis-of-number-of-bugs/comment-page-1/#comment-63702</link>
		<dc:creator>mahantesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 08:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/charge-client-on-basis-of-number-of-bugs/#comment-63702</guid>
		<description>This is very good  idea, both the client and Testing Team will get benefit. For this minimum charge should be done apart from that charge based on the no.of Bugs can be included bec testers efforts.But Testing should be in time frame.It is good for testers,because they can test the product with open minded.and the clients can get more bugs bec testing team always try to find more bugs bec thy want earn more money. in this concept ,the product quality ll be increased and also testing team can earn more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very good  idea, both the client and Testing Team will get benefit. For this minimum charge should be done apart from that charge based on the no.of Bugs can be included bec testers efforts.But Testing should be in time frame.It is good for testers,because they can test the product with open minded.and the clients can get more bugs bec testing team always try to find more bugs bec thy want earn more money. in this concept ,the product quality ll be increased and also testing team can earn more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: priya</title>
		<link>http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/charge-client-on-basis-of-number-of-bugs/comment-page-1/#comment-49626</link>
		<dc:creator>priya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/charge-client-on-basis-of-number-of-bugs/#comment-49626</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s simply a Worst Idea...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s simply a Worst Idea&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joby Joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/charge-client-on-basis-of-number-of-bugs/comment-page-1/#comment-32338</link>
		<dc:creator>Joby Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 06:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/charge-client-on-basis-of-number-of-bugs/#comment-32338</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the good Topic!

But I am not really satisfied with this idea, as the tester only will concentrate to increase the number of bugs rather than thinking on the quality of the product.

But if there is a balanced system for billing per bug by considering both tester and the client, then it make sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the good Topic!</p>
<p>But I am not really satisfied with this idea, as the tester only will concentrate to increase the number of bugs rather than thinking on the quality of the product.</p>
<p>But if there is a balanced system for billing per bug by considering both tester and the client, then it make sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 3.096 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-08 17:22:10 -->

