Software Testing Test Coverage Complete Guide: How to Test More, Save Time, and Achieve Better Testing Results:
Software testing is an essential activity in the software development and maintenance life cycles. It is a practice often used to decide and improve software quality.
Development is more systematic nowadays and organizations seek measures of testing completeness and effectiveness to show test completion criteria. Of them all, coverage is considered especially valuable.
What You Will Learn:
Simply put, coverage is “What are we testing and How much are we testing?”
Test coverage helps monitor the quality of testing, and assists testers to create tests that cover areas that are missing or not validated.
Most teams base their coverage calculations on functional requirements alone. It is also fair because first and foremost an application should do what it is supposed to do. If not, its speed or security or ease of use – none of it matters.
However, if dedicated and independent non-functional testing teams are working on performance, security, usability testing, etc., then they will have to track their requirements all the way to execution through test coverage analytics.
Test coverage is often confused with Code Coverage. Even though the underlying principles are the same, they are two different things.
Code Coverage really talks about unit testing practices that have to target all areas of the code at least once and is done by developers.
Test Coverage, on the other hand, is testing every requirement at least once and is obviously a QA team activity.
What really qualifies to be a covered requirement depends on the interpretation of each team.
For example, Some teams call a requirement covered if there is at least one test case against it. Sometimes, it is covered if at least one team member is assigned to it. Or, if all the test cases associated with it are executed.
It is also important as to when to calculate coverage.
If you do this too early in the process, you will see a lot of gaps because things are still incomplete. So it is generally advised to wait until the Last Build i.e. Final Regression Build. This will give a correct coverage of the Tests performed for the given Requirements.
Also read => Release and Deployment Management Process
Scene 8 years ago: When I was having 2 years of experience in software testing industry I was thinking that it was alright if I don’t know some fundamentals about software testing as something one can learn with experience and me too will do.
I was right – and wrong as well.
Right because with experience, you learn to see a bigger picture, you understand the real meaning of “Critical Situation” and you understand the end user more.
Wrong because none of the mentioned things require experience, but early learning, which I understood very late. That is the encouraging factor to write this post.
Here is my experience from one of the interviews at that time:
How do you make sure that test coverage is complete or maximum? I was asked.
Ummmm……I make sure that I test every functionality, I said.
So you are saying that once you test all the functionalities, you feel that you have covered a maximum of application/product, in terms of testing, the interviewer backfired.
Ummm…well….ummm….yes, because when you test all the functionalities, you are confident about application/product’s behavior, I supported my answer.
I agree, but my question is – will it give you confidence that your testing coverage is maximum or complete? the interviewer was in no mood to let me go.
Now, I was growing impatient, unknown about the fact that I was going to learn one of the most important topics about software testing – “Test coverage”.
Rather than reproducing the excerpts of the interview, I am summarizing here, what I learned about Testing Coverage, on that day. But before that let’s be clear on one point – testing coverage does not ever mean to know whether you are testing enough or not, neither it means you are testing perfectly or not.
Testing coverage can have a different meaning in different context. Let’s discover those contexts one-by-one:
Product coverage – What aspects of the product did you look at?
Yes, when testing coverage is being measured in terms of product, the main area to focus on is – which areas of product you have tested and which remains untested?
If “knife” is a product, you are testing; just do not concentrate on checking whether it cuts the vegetables/fruits properly. There are other aspects to look for such as – the user should be able to handle it comfortably.
If “notepad” is an application, you are testing, checking relevant features is a must thing.
But other aspects to be taken care are – application responds properly while using other applications simultaneously, the application does not crash when the user tries to do something unusual, the user is provided proper warning/error messages, the user is able to understand and use the application easily, help content is available when required.
If you don’t look into the mentioned scenarios, you can’t claim that the testing coverage for the application is complete.
Risk coverage – What risks have you tested for?
Risk coverage is another aspect to have complete testing coverage. You can’t tag the product or application as “tested” until you test the associated risks too. Coverage of associated risks is an important factor in overall testing coverage.
While testing an airplane, if a tester tells you that he/she has fully tested the internal system of the airplane and it’s working fine but only flying capability of the airplane was not covered while testing – what would be your reaction?
Well, that is what risk coverage means. Identifying risk as per the application/product and testing it thoroughly is always a good practice.
While testing an e-commerce site, tester considered every effective factor but did not consider the risk of numbers of users accessing the website simultaneously and on the Super OFFER day, the not considered risk proved to be a huge mistake.
Recommended reading =>
Requirements coverage – What requirements have you tested for?
If a product or application is developed very well but if it’s not matching with customer’s requirements then it’s of no use. Requirement coverage while testing is as important as product coverage.
Excited for the family function, you asked the tailor to stitch your dress and put on those peacock blue show buttons on the neckline.
While stitching the dress, tailor thought that putting those buttons on neckline will not look good so he stitched a golden colored border instead. On the trial day, definitely, the unhappy customer shouted at the tailor for not sticking to the requirements.
Example #2 :
While testing a chat application, tester took care of all the important points like multiple users chatting in a group, two users chatting independently, all types of emoticons available, updates sent to user immediately etc. but forgot to look into requirement document, which clearly mentioned that when two users chat independently, video call option should be enabled.
The client marketed the chat application claiming that it would allow calling, while two users chat independently. You can imagine what would have happened to the chat application.
Also read=> How to Create Requirements Traceability Matrix
Awareness is everything:
First things first, the QA team must know how much work is involved and where the design tasks are at. This way, they are going to be aware if more tests are to be added. To do this, you could use an RTM as is the typical practice.
=> Check this article out to know more about it and how to use it: How to Create Requirements Traceability Matrix – Exact Process with Sample Template
Secondly, check resource assignment and test execution process to see if everything is tested in the more effective manner.
A table such as below can be helpful:
|Test Type||Total Cases||Executed Cases||Status||Comments|
|Functional||100||80||50 pass , 30 fail|
|Compatibility||100||50||45 pass, 5 fail|
|Usability||100||100||98 pass, 2 fail|
|Final Regression||100||100||99 pass, 1 fail|
#1) Resource jumbling: Exchange tasks between your team members. This helps improve engagement and prevent knowledge concentration.
#3) Ownership: Make testers accountable and give them a free rein (with monitoring and support of course) for the module/task that they are working on. This helps build responsibility and lets them try creative ways instead of following the beaten down the road.
#4) Deadlines: Knowing the release deadlines prior to the commencement of testing phase helps with effective planning
#5) Communication: Stay in touch with the dev and other teams in between release cycles to know what’s going on.
#6) Maintain an RTM: Acts as a good derivative to the Stakeholders or Clients, based on which the release schedule can be confirmed
Test coverage does not end with the mentioned contexts. There are many other points that should be considered when it comes to testing coverage.
It is not always true that when you test more, the results are better. In fact, when you test more with no apparent strategy, you probably will end up investing a lot of time.
With a more structured approach, an aim at 100% requirement coverage and effective testing methods, you will not compromise on quality.
We hope the techniques outlined in this article will give you some pointers.
Pour in your comments and views about the post. As usual, we love to hear from you.