Comments on: Developers are not good testers. What you say? http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/developers-are-not-good-testers/ Software Testing Complete Guide Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:06:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: sidh http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/developers-are-not-good-testers/comment-page-2/#comment-81516 sidh Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:17:27 +0000 http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/developers-are-not-good-testers/#comment-81516 hi.. I have a doubt regarding the unit testing!!! if unit testing is done by "Developers" then which type of testing would we call when a "Tester" done testing on each individual modules..?? plz reply as soon as possible.. hi.. I have a doubt regarding the unit testing!!! if unit testing is done by “Developers” then which type of testing would we call when a “Tester” done testing on each individual modules..?? plz reply as soon as possible..

]]> By: Jitendra Bhande http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/developers-are-not-good-testers/comment-page-2/#comment-81498 Jitendra Bhande Tue, 19 Jul 2011 09:35:56 +0000 http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/developers-are-not-good-testers/#comment-81498 ya.....True alright... we(QA 's) are essential to make Product...AQuality one. ya…..True alright…
we(QA ‘s) are essential to make Product…AQuality one.

]]> By: Engineer http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/developers-are-not-good-testers/comment-page-2/#comment-80226 Engineer Mon, 07 Mar 2011 12:27:17 +0000 http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/developers-are-not-good-testers/#comment-80226 Developer can make surety of code to function well, but one cannot guarantee of the product with qualitative features. Quality can only be resembled with better efforts taken by testers like Agile Testers to satisfy customer needs and their satisfactions. Developer can make surety of code to function well, but one cannot guarantee of the product with qualitative features. Quality can only be resembled with better efforts taken by testers like Agile Testers to satisfy customer needs and their satisfactions.

]]> By: Engineer http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/developers-are-not-good-testers/comment-page-2/#comment-80225 Engineer Mon, 07 Mar 2011 12:21:52 +0000 http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/developers-are-not-good-testers/#comment-80225 Greetings to all interested persons, The main cons of developers to introduce in testing part are that, developers feel extra burden, pressure, self value and respest of being dveloper and many more. The other main factor is, if testers are allowed to test separately after each release then certainly there will be fast tracks to develop any software. it saves time, enhances security and quick availability to end users. it may be also noted that, if developers are ready to do all tests of their portions, then definitely they are worth to get double salary, i.e one for as a developer and another is of testing job. therefore it can be concluded from example, if any program is run by the developer and it executes successfully. it means coder has done good job by removing errors of one's code. But, on other hand one does not guarantee that this sort of code will be supported by all sort of browsers or servers or not. therefore, here testers are key role players who can test all bugs, made by developers and from others. Thus, testers should be taken as individual members of any team to perform their important role to develop any product. Greetings to all interested persons,

The main cons of developers to introduce in testing part are that, developers feel extra burden, pressure, self value and respest of being dveloper and many more. The other main factor is, if testers are allowed to test separately after each release then certainly there will be fast tracks to develop any software. it saves time, enhances security and quick availability to end users. it may be also noted that, if developers are ready to do all tests of their portions, then definitely they are worth to get double salary, i.e one for as a developer and another is of testing job. therefore it can be concluded from example, if any program is run by the developer and it executes successfully. it means coder has done good job by removing errors of one’s code. But, on other hand one does not guarantee that this sort of code will be supported by all sort of browsers or servers or not. therefore, here testers are key role players who can test all bugs, made by developers and from others. Thus, testers should be taken as individual members of any team to perform their important role to develop any product.

]]> By: Engineer Akhter http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/developers-are-not-good-testers/comment-page-2/#comment-80224 Engineer Akhter Mon, 07 Mar 2011 12:19:26 +0000 http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/developers-are-not-good-testers/#comment-80224 The main cons of developers to introduce in testing part are that, developers feel extra burden, pressure, self value and respest of being dveloper and many more. The other main factor is, if testers are allowed to test separately after each release then certainly there will be fast tracks to develop any software. it saves time, enhances security and quick availability to end users. it may be also noted that, if developers are ready to do all tests of their portions, then definitely they are worth to get double salary, i.e one for as a developer and another is of testing job. therefore it can be concluded from example, if any program is run by the developer and it executes successfully. it means coder has done good job by removing errors of one's code. But, on other hand one does not guarantee that this sort of code will be supported by all sort of browsers or servers or not. therefore, here testers are key role players who can test all bugs, made by developers and from others. Thus, testers should be taken as individual members of any team to perform their important role to develop any product. The main cons of developers to introduce in testing part are that, developers feel extra burden, pressure, self value and respest of being dveloper and many more. The other main factor is, if testers are allowed to test separately after each release then certainly there will be fast tracks to develop any software. it saves time, enhances security and quick availability to end users. it may be also noted that, if developers are ready to do all tests of their portions, then definitely they are worth to get double salary, i.e one for as a developer and another is of testing job. therefore it can be concluded from example, if any program is run by the developer and it executes successfully. it means coder has done good job by removing errors of one’s code. But, on other hand one does not guarantee that this sort of code will be supported by all sort of browsers or servers or not. therefore, here testers are key role players who can test all bugs, made by developers and from others. Thus, testers should be taken as individual members of any team to perform their important role to develop any product.

]]> By: vaishali http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/developers-are-not-good-testers/comment-page-2/#comment-79987 vaishali Tue, 08 Feb 2011 10:12:32 +0000 http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/developers-are-not-good-testers/#comment-79987 yes,I agreed developer is not a good tester because nobody detect own mistakes,developer is developer and tester is tester yes,I agreed developer is not a good tester because nobody detect own mistakes,developer is developer and tester is tester

]]> By: shakti http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/developers-are-not-good-testers/comment-page-2/#comment-76055 shakti Fri, 08 Oct 2010 09:48:47 +0000 http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/developers-are-not-good-testers/#comment-76055 I would say that a software developer can be a tester, but I must say software tester cant be a good software developer. There is no comparison between software tester and developer. Software Tester are nothing before software developer. A developer uses whole of the mind, techniques, effort to write a piece of code to develop a software or application, and what a tester does, just test that and find bugs, if this work is assigned to another developer, he can easily do testing because a developer can be a good tester, but a tester cant be a good developer. I would say that a software developer can be a tester, but I must say software tester cant be a good software developer. There is no comparison between software tester and developer. Software Tester are nothing before software developer. A developer uses whole of the mind, techniques, effort to write a piece of code to develop a software or application, and what a tester does, just test that and find bugs, if this work is assigned to another developer, he can easily do testing because a developer can be a good tester, but a tester cant be a good developer.

]]> By: Shakti http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/developers-are-not-good-testers/comment-page-2/#comment-76053 Shakti Fri, 08 Oct 2010 09:39:08 +0000 http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/developers-are-not-good-testers/#comment-76053 hi i just want to say that there is no comparison of tester and developers. Developer are the person who put their mind and all for developing an application and ther person(tester) who can not develop at least a single line of code in his whole life, judge that peice of code. I think there must be improvement when organization going to recruit testers. They should hire only the person who are having sound knwoldege of programming, developing application, and if organiztion shift them in devleoping so than they would be able to work in development also. hi i just want to say that there is no comparison of tester and developers. Developer are the person who put their mind and all for developing an application and ther person(tester) who can not develop at least a single line of code in his whole life, judge that peice of code.
I think there must be improvement when organization going to recruit testers. They should hire only the person who are having sound knwoldege of programming, developing application, and if organiztion shift them in devleoping so than they would be able to work in development also.

]]> By: yangma http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/developers-are-not-good-testers/comment-page-2/#comment-69629 yangma Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:31:59 +0000 http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/developers-are-not-good-testers/#comment-69629 it's obvious that developers don't like someone else pointing out their mistakes.. during my exam before submitting my paper i used to calculate my marks..and when the results would come out my calculated marks and teachers given marks would always differ by vast margin :D that means even if developers themselves test their code they would never find out what real testers can trace out the odds..it's their baby..their hard work ;) it’s obvious that developers don’t like someone else pointing out their mistakes..
during my exam before submitting my paper i used to calculate my marks..and when the results would come out my calculated marks and teachers given marks would always differ by vast margin :D

that means even if developers themselves test their code they would never find out what real testers can trace out the odds..it’s their baby..their hard work ;)

]]> By: hariprasad http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/developers-are-not-good-testers/comment-page-2/#comment-66664 hariprasad Sat, 17 Jul 2010 11:18:43 +0000 http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/developers-are-not-good-testers/#comment-66664 what ever you said is absolutely cortrect,no one is accept to defect in there developed project a tester can identify what ever you said is absolutely cortrect,no one is accept to defect in there developed project a tester can identify

]]>